Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fr. Paul's avatar

Blaming childhood abuse for committing half a million in theft seems like a slap in the face to survivors of childhood abuse.

Expand full comment
Kurt's avatar

//The Capuchin Province of St. Mary, headquartered in New York, declined to comment on why the priest used a public defender, or whether he has yet been formally dismissed from the order.//

//The province told The Pillar it had no comment.//

About the same in my Capuchin parish after one of their friars molested parish girls. No comment on anything. Parishioners were told to their face they had no rights to any information (which is, of course true, we have no rights). They wouldn't even confirm information that came out in the court trial and seemed annoyed we followed the court proceedings, almost like we were snooping on them.

There is no way that my employer nor any of the charities whose boards I sit on would ever have missed easily verifiable background check items like a medical license, charity incorporation or college degree. Yet the NY Capuchins didn't bother to perform a meaningful background check despite all of the promises they are protecting our children and protecting our tithes.

The bottom line is that we have a Church which says they are protecting our children but will not give the laity the right to know how they are protecting our children or our tithes. In such circumstances, they should not be trusted.

Lastly, I applaud The Pillar for continuing to report on this story. Even in the Capuchin's "no comment" we have learned much.

Expand full comment
43 more comments...
Latest

No posts