Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Reginald K.'s avatar

Presumably the government didn’t want to wade into the obscure question of what Harry’s actual surname is. William, as many know, used the surname “Mountbatten-Windsor” when suing Closer magazine in the French courts, but the order-in-council providing that “Mountbatten-Windsor” is the surname of certain royals doesn’t seem to apply to him (or to Harry). At Sandhurst and in the military he used the surname “Wales”, but now his father is no longer the Prince of Wales. So it was probably wise for DOJ to sidestep the issue entirely.

Expand full comment
Jay Dunlap's avatar

Regarding the "rightsizing" question, how much could you expand if you raised the subscription price by a nominal amount, say 50 cents or $1 a month? Seems to me ta gentle way to spread the cost of growth and do more of what you are doing very well in a way no one else is doing it.

Expand full comment
32 more comments...
Latest

No posts