Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fr. Jeff Johnston's avatar

If I'm not mistaken, wasn't Olson involved in some other "issue" not that many years ago?

He sounds to be - more than a bit - on the pompous side, impressed with what he perceives as his Episcopal Rights, completely ignoring or forgetting what the First Shepherd of the flock said of himself, "I have come not to be served, but to serve." If, indeed, there is an issue at stake here - involving any of the nuns of the monastery - there is a polite, private and very proper way to go about handling the matter, all while preserving the dignity of the community, diocese, and even the bishop. The "I'll show you" method he has chosen shows him only to be concerned with maintaining or establishing his authority and prerogatives. Does his background include any time serving in any Roman office, giving him contact and connections to people in powerful positions? Does the protocol number if the case indicate that he has "had it out" for this community for some time? The Dicastery for Consecrated Life would/should be there to protect any community from the aggressive action of anyone, especially a bishop, against a community in his diocese. Too many things, from the head down, stink in this matter!

Expand full comment
Joe McCarthy's avatar

I’m kind of at a loss for words on this one... and sadly, I’m rarely shocked by news in the Church.

Expand full comment
61 more comments...
Latest

No posts