11 Comments
User's avatar
Ed. Condon's avatar

Everyone, sorry: When this went out, I said the liturgy of consecration would begin at 17.00 Roman time, 11am on the East Coast.

It turns out that because Europe doesn’t observe Daylight Savings Time until next week, it’s only a five hour time difference. You all know my feelings about DST. This is just further proof that I am right: it’s a godless and unnatural action that is costing lives, and now quite possibly souls, too.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Rather than apologising for using bad language, why not just not use it?

Expand full comment
JD Flynn's avatar

I think I missed the apology!

Expand full comment
Jamie Morris's avatar

"it’s a godless and unnatural action that is costing lives, and now quite possibly souls, too."

Still salty about the Swatch news, I see.

Expand full comment
Ed. Condon's avatar

You have no idea.

Expand full comment
Dan K's avatar

No MoonSwatch in your future, Mr. Condon?

Expand full comment
Ed. Condon's avatar

No.

Expand full comment
Mr. Karamazov's avatar

Come Ed you're English - "Lady Day" is way more fun to say than feast of the Annunciation!

Expand full comment
Hans's avatar

"[T]he committee room has its own event horizon, beyond which time passes more slowly, like some kind of intellectual black hole."

Would that that were true. Then they would eventually disappear beyond the event horizon, never to be seen again, except perhaps in the form of neutrinos that can somehow tunnel out … . It's more like a superdense neutron star, whose atoms have collapsed into a mess of protons, neutrons, and electrons; the gravitational effects are similar, in that it would cause a time dilation that would cause things to stretch out and last seemingly forever, but they never go away.

Somehow that seems worse to me.

Expand full comment
Hans's avatar

"How, I ask you, can it be possible, legally speaking, for the Senate to hold confirmation hearings on a nomination for a position that is not vacant? … In canon law, such a situation is unthinkable — and is specifically outlawed, as a matter of fact."

Well, yes and no. Canon 403 §3 allows for coadjutor bishops, who have the right of succession. (Sometimes such an appointment seems to me to be a pope's way of saying: 'Here's your zucchetto, what's your hurry?') Perhaps you can think of this situation as akin to having a (non-voting) coadjutor Supreme Court justice? There's something Capetian about it.

Expand full comment
Bisbee's avatar

Francis the Merciful’s treatment of Bp.Fernández In Puerto Rico and now his messing around with the Vatican’s judicial system, plus many other issues it seems/is that His Holiness is the most authoritarian pope in centuries.

May God deliver us!

Expand full comment