Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Father G.'s avatar

I do a lot of work with my diocesan vocations office, screening/interviewing candidates and assisting in the assignment of seminarians to parishes/jobs.

In my view, a largely unsung gift of the propaedeutic period is that it gives the seminaries the time and space in formation to address really important human issues (whether a lack of maturity, certain sorts of psychological needs as mentioned in the article, etc.) in the guys. These issues aren't disqualifying, it's just that addressing those issues during the regular rigor of the seminary would prove disruptive to the man and maybe just too much to do at once. Previously, we might want a guy to wait a year or so before entering to address some of those issues preliminarily. Now, sometimes, that's not necessary.

Propaedeutic doesn't lower the bar, it just gives us the resources to build a better foundation for the men according to their particular needs.

The propaedeutic period, I sincerely believe, will prove to be the most important development in seminary formation since Pastores Dabo Vobis (of which it is really a fruit). Supernaturally, its gifts will likely never be measurable but profoundly evident.

I'm not thrilled about the Vocational Synthesis (we'll see in the next few years what happens with that...), but propaedeutic is a heck of a step in the right direction for an enriching of the priesthood.

Expand full comment
Fr. Brian John Zuelke, O.P.'s avatar

The Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis under the leadership of Archbishop Bernard Hebda is a model in many ways, and this is for sure one of its outstanding facets. Every seminary should have a propadeutic year, and I wish such an experience was available for every young Catholic today regardless of their vocation. Couples preparing for marriage could go through something similar, I suspect, though it would have to work around a number of factors, work being the main one.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...
Latest

No posts