Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter's avatar

Synodality is a sham. The decision to close that diocese was made and while the powers that be may be content to delay implementing their decision for a bit to give lip service to “listening to the local community” the administrators removal just shows they will jettison anyone who objects too loudly or effectively.

Expand full comment
Father Edward Horkan's avatar

I very much question the theory that small dioceses are less sustainable than middle size or larger ones. Last November, The Pillar published an article that described a survey of the sizes of dioceses in the United States and the number of seminarians per capita. It indicated that there is a substantial inverse relationship between the size of a diocese and the number of seminarians per capita. That result is not surprising. For in smaller diocese the bishop can, if he chooses, more easily be a father figure. By contrast, in larger dioceses the bishop is more remote, and the chancery tends to be seen as the central administration of a nonprofit organization, rather than an inspiring example. As a result, I think that the solution to whatever issues there are in the Stubenbville Diocese should be solved more by a dynamic, personable and trusted bishop than by merging it into another diocese, especially given the fact that most of the clergy and laity seem to oppose such a merger.

Expand full comment
56 more comments...
Latest

No posts