Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew K Michels, OblSB's avatar

I would just like to say that, as a positive note: it looks like the abuse response system that the US Church has put much effort into honing, is really starting to come into its own as a functional SOP, and is actually working fairly smoothly. And the process is largely being enforced *consistently* each time.

Barring some uneasiness around what Fr. Hoare's future will be under +Martin, it seems all the things that were meant to happen in the response process happened as they should, which is encouraging to see. And I've noticed this with other recent cases as well: whatever your stance on the Father Carlos Martins fiasco, it's clear that the institutional response process was quick, efficient, reasonably transparent, and measured.

I'm really grateful to see this working. It's taken *a lot* of trial and error to get to where we are now: arguably *the* premier institution in the US in 2025 when it comes to handling sexual abuse of minors. That's the best restitution we can make to living and deceased survivors, and a good systematized process that is efficiently and fairly enforced consistently is the best way to ensure right fairness to both victim and accused.

Expand full comment
Christopher Y's avatar

Sad to hear that Bishop Martin even has to give this any consideration.

I am so blessed to live in the Diocese of Arlington. Here is what my bishop said in 2018…

“Additionally, I assure you that no priest credibly accused of child sexual abuse is, or ever will be, in active ministry in this Diocese.”

www.arlingtondiocese.org/2018/08/21/letter-to-the-faithful-from-bishop-burbidge/

Expand full comment
51 more comments...
Latest

No posts