Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Lieblang's avatar

The idea that someone aged 42 is past the age of bulk criminal activity seems like a stretch to say the least. Maybe if you look at all criminal activity, like murder, maybe younger people commit more murder, but white collar crimes like embezzlement, I would think any age would be susceptible to that type of crime. Actually, the older you get and more responsibility you get, I would think you have a greater opportunity to commit white collar crimes. A young intern or entry-level position is much less likely to have the power to subvert internal controls than an older executive.

Expand full comment
Matthew K Michels, OblSB's avatar

I think this partly wrapped up in a broader set of issues that arises from having “missionary” priests from underdeveloped countries come to the US as pastors.

Fr. Mauricio (whom I’ve met many times over) does indeed come across to many as a benign gentle and warm-hearted priest.

But there’s inevitably a problem when priests from low-wealth underdeveloped countries, where the idea of managing finances is more “fast and loose” and tight reporting and regulations, where money and resources are often seen as communal, and where fiduciary responsibility is less of a common cultural phenomenon… now traveling to the US to be placed in authority over a parish (a small local place in their mind) with levels of money are comparatively extravagant compared to their currency and economic situation back home (Americans of “modest financial means” are seen as very wealthy by foreign priests when compared to people in their home countries). Of course things like “a new riding lawnmower for a priests’ residence” and “clerical vestments in Rome” seem like they could be normal purchases.

A missionary priest from India (for a different example) could easily be very tempted to use parish funds, because we have insane wealth compared to the average Indian, and his home culture is not necessarily renowned for inculcating good financial regulating, fiscal reporting and transparency, and separation of funds for earmarked purposes. Who’s shocked?

And some of these missionary priests are basically extorted by their home diocese (particularly Indian dioceses), where much of a foreign pastor’s pay gets funneled back to the home diocese, leaving the priest with an even smaller pay than what priests already typically receive. This breeds both resentment and desperation, which are the breeding grounds for self-justification of parish theft.

Father Mauricio probably has family back in Venezuela who’ve had to see neighbors resort to eating dogs several times over during financial crises. We Americans have extravagant wealth in unimaginable excess by comparison, so why not (as the thinking goes) use a portion of the communal funds of such excess to help make a repair the floors of a priest residence?

Expand full comment
33 more comments...
Latest

No posts