Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rienzi's avatar
2dEdited

This is good news, and the court made the right and proper decision here. But it almost wasn’t: the 2024 Minnesota ERA (which would’ve changed the state constitution to protect MoChridie) almost passed, and only failed on a technicality of quorum. If it had quorum, it would’ve passed, and the school would have lost the case. And in Wisconsin, the state supreme court ruled that Catholic Charities cannot be considered protected as faith-based organizations. And in Washington state, the infamous bill that requires priests to violate the Seal of Confession is now the law by letter, unchanged, and the only consolation is that the state said “well we’ll just not enforce it on priests (for now).”

This MN case is a victory, but we still have a long uphill battle ahead. We are still hanging on the precipice.

Expand full comment
Josh McCampbell's avatar

I am once again shocked that lawyers and lay people alike keep challenging the local church in these matters. It is absolutely a waste of time. Firstly though, why hire this person in the first place? There must have been some concept of them not living in a manner according to the faith before they were hired. I get the don't ask, don't tell narrative, but still. It's not a hard situation to decipher.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...
Latest

No posts

Ready for more?