The Pillar is probably the only place I would feel like it's worthwhile to ask this question. It used to be that one interesting thing about the Knights was that they were a sovereign even though they had no territory. But how can you really be a sovereign if the head of another state is choosing and deposing your leadership, and writing your constitution?
The Pillar is probably the only place I would feel like it's worthwhile to ask this question. It used to be that one interesting thing about the Knights was that they were a sovereign even though they had no territory. But how can you really be a sovereign if the head of another state is choosing and deposing your leadership, and writing your constitution?