Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Justin D.'s avatar

I sometimes think diocesan consolidation/merger like this can be the best way forward but I don't know what the real situation on the ground and financially speaking is in the Steubenville Diocese.

However, if the Church is going to merge diocese like this given the population shifts and other factors over the past 50 years, I do think the Church needs to consider appointing & consecrating more auxiliary bishops then (and not only in the really large dioceses) & giving those auxiliaries real territorial responsibility within a portion of the diocese. The auxiliary could handle a lot of the regular and more frequent visits to parishes & schools, hospitals & cemeteries, perform confirmations, etc.

For example, Bishop Barron was an auxiliary in the LA Archdiocese and sounded like he had territorial responsibility under his Archbishop for a certain segment of that vast diocese.

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

I moved from the Diocese of Tyler to the Archdiocese of Denver a year ago. The diocese of Tyler goes from Crockett, Texas in East Texas to Texarkana Texas which is at the Arkansas-Texas border. It takes a bishop almost three hours to drive one way to Texarkana and two hours to Crockett. The diocese was formed from taking some areas from the Dallas diocese and from the Galveston-Houston Diocese. It’s hard for me to see how a bishop can regularly visit all the diocese.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...
Latest

No posts