I don't know what the final document contains, but it's probably safe to assume it is much like the draft the Pillar posted a few days ago. I hope those who desire the document to contain more directed admonishments toward abortion supporters can see the value of the pastoral/teaching approach that document takes. Admonishments are best handled in one-on-one sessions with just the concerned parties (where one party's very soul is at risk). We do not need to import publicly aired "cancel culture" into our faith. We instead *desperately* need outreach, and the draft document moves us in that direction.
I sincerely don't understand why the chance to "have their say" would result in passing the exact same document. If they didn't like it, how would saying so be enough? If they did, why would they care that they got to say so? What am I missing?
I don't know what the final document contains, but it's probably safe to assume it is much like the draft the Pillar posted a few days ago. I hope those who desire the document to contain more directed admonishments toward abortion supporters can see the value of the pastoral/teaching approach that document takes. Admonishments are best handled in one-on-one sessions with just the concerned parties (where one party's very soul is at risk). We do not need to import publicly aired "cancel culture" into our faith. We instead *desperately* need outreach, and the draft document moves us in that direction.
I sincerely don't understand why the chance to "have their say" would result in passing the exact same document. If they didn't like it, how would saying so be enough? If they did, why would they care that they got to say so? What am I missing?