Discussion about this post

User's avatar
B B's avatar

I'm glad the pilgrimage is keeping its distance from Rupnik's art, but how sad it is that the burden to create that distance will fall on the young men and women who signed up to spend their summers walking with Christ as witnesses to the faith because the Church and the shrine have dragged their feet on what clearly ought to be done

Expand full comment
Daniel F. Kane's avatar

As a 4th Generation Knight, with 5th generation sons in the Order, the present leadership is historically weak and cowardly.

The art of an ordained sexual deviant should be covered with a large tarp, and ultimately destroyed. Rupnik has done unspeakable and previously unheard of deviancies with consecrated women and continues to enjoy prominence...

BECAUSE THOSE IN POWER AT THE K of C APPROVE.

At this juncture, it is the only plausible reason. In the $1.3 Billion in assets and $120 Billion in insurance, under the full control of the Knights of Columbus, less than 0.1% can restore the St. JPII Shrine to the holiness the faithful deserve. This does not include over $2 Billion in assets reported on the K of C Charities IRS 990 in 2018. If they want to remodel, funds appear to be available.

Not a matter of money or prudence. It is a matter of courage and assent.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...
Latest

No posts