It would be interesting to know what the SSPX thinks about the now former nuns claiming association with them. I could see one on hand groups like this being drawn together out of a shared persecution complex; on the other hand, despite their history of poor decision-making with regards to church authority, maybe the SSPX isn’t exactly looking for an additional liability vis-a-vis some rogue former nuns.
Here before they fix the typo!
But would you be willing to flag it for me?
never mind. found it.
“Hold See” in the second to last paragraph
One more typo: "and had already receive [should be "received"] a 'favourable opinion' from the previous pope."
I love having a canon lawyer Pope fixing canonical loopholes. This just says how much fun the next 20 years of this Pope will be!!!
It would be interesting to know what the SSPX thinks about the now former nuns claiming association with them. I could see one on hand groups like this being drawn together out of a shared persecution complex; on the other hand, despite their history of poor decision-making with regards to church authority, maybe the SSPX isn’t exactly looking for an additional liability vis-a-vis some rogue former nuns.