6 Comments
User's avatar
Ann Kuehlers's avatar

In some ways, reducing the number of parishes is a sleight of hand. On one level, quite a bit of the (especially non-sacramental) admin like running pre-schools can be centralized. Confirmation prep (once every 2 years) will also take place across the mega-parish, but for the most part (very often) the same priests say Mass at the same time they always did. Many things are still organized at the level of the now officially defunct pastoral-units (Seelsorgeeinheiten).

Dies Illa's avatar

Then what is the end of doing it?

Ann Kuehlers's avatar

That they can turn over a lot of the admin to professionals and have just one "pastor" legally responsible for all the pre-schools instead of that job being something that takes up part of 9 priests' time with each smaller parish responsible for three-preschools and their staff. Later, it will make it easier to thin out the Mass schedule without constant reorganisation and arguments about closing parishes. Even now, it's easier for them to shuffle priests for coverage because they aren't as tied to the clusters as they were.

Joe Witkowski's avatar

Behold I am Steubenville, and I make all things new. 🕯️

Hieronymus's avatar

"Canon 428. §1 While the see is vacant, no innovation is to be made."

Pretty legendary take by this guy. "“It thus breaks the continuity of diocesan life, and so runs counter to the actual meaning of the prohibition of change in Canon 428 § 1.”

AKA: "See, what it says is actually what the opposite of what it says."

When you approach the guy, he simply winks, puts his finger to his lips and uses the age old sign of recognition....

"There are many chickens in Westphalia."

Cranberry Chuck's avatar

My impression is that the administrator's letter was just a detailed criticism of the nuncio and the Vatican in "pastoral letter" format. Very petty.