@Steven Umbrello @Alex Spieldenner @Ray Alex Williams @Donald Paul Maddox @Dylan Campbell @Jonathan Dunn @William E. @Thomas Salerno @J. A. Siemer @J. M. Terry @Nate Marshall @Wesley Walker @Eric Anderson check this out!
First, thank you for this summary. This is a great service to the Church. One concern is that this is just another step toward subjectivism, meaning philosophical Modernism, and away from an Aristotlian/Thomist objective and Natural Law based morality. Francis removed tenured faculty from the Pope John Paul II Institute (think Veritatis Splendor), gave it a new name and charter. Why? To move to a psychological subjective morality to usher in a new “pastoral” approach to same sexed ideology. What he should have done is start his own institute with his own name on it. I would be curious to see how many theologians are on both.
Where in this article or the document referenced do you see things that raise concerns about that? I don’t see anything in this article that raises concerns about that.
@Steven Umbrello @Alex Spieldenner @Ray Alex Williams @Donald Paul Maddox @Dylan Campbell @Jonathan Dunn @William E. @Thomas Salerno @J. A. Siemer @J. M. Terry @Nate Marshall @Wesley Walker @Eric Anderson check this out!
First, thank you for this summary. This is a great service to the Church. One concern is that this is just another step toward subjectivism, meaning philosophical Modernism, and away from an Aristotlian/Thomist objective and Natural Law based morality. Francis removed tenured faculty from the Pope John Paul II Institute (think Veritatis Splendor), gave it a new name and charter. Why? To move to a psychological subjective morality to usher in a new “pastoral” approach to same sexed ideology. What he should have done is start his own institute with his own name on it. I would be curious to see how many theologians are on both.
Where in this article or the document referenced do you see things that raise concerns about that? I don’t see anything in this article that raises concerns about that.