If people infrequently avail themselves of a certain aspect of the law (i.e. late-term abortions) it does not make that aspect of the law “non-factual”; a loophole, maybe, but certainly still legal. I found this a perplexing stance for a “fact-checking” organisation, and particularly galling when the “rape and incest” argument from the other side is perpetuated and widely accepted by so many, despite also being an infrequent occurrence.
The Pillar In-Depth S1E3: 'How can I separate fact from fiction here?'
If people infrequently avail themselves of a certain aspect of the law (i.e. late-term abortions) it does not make that aspect of the law “non-factual”; a loophole, maybe, but certainly still legal. I found this a perplexing stance for a “fact-checking” organisation, and particularly galling when the “rape and incest” argument from the other side is perpetuated and widely accepted by so many, despite also being an infrequent occurrence.